Battle of the IRON CHEF trade marks
Fuji Television Network Inc v Iron Chef Pizza Pty Ltd (2020) ATMO 107 (18 June 2020)  This decision concerns an opposition by Fuji Television Network Inc (“Fuji Television”) to an...
Fuji Television Network Inc v Iron Chef Pizza Pty Ltd (2020) ATMO 107 (18 June 2020)  This decision concerns an...
Read More
Rolex S.A. successfully prevents registration of “MARINER”
This article looks at the recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) in the Matter of a Trade Mark Application by FMTM Distribution Ltd and Opposition Thereto...
This article looks at the recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) in the Matter of a...
Read More
Kraft v Bega: Implications for trade mark licensing in Australia
On 14 April 2020, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia handed down an appeal decision with important implications for trade mark licensing in Australia, and in...
On 14 April 2020, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia handed down an appeal decision with...
Read More
マレーシア:「リップタトゥー」は汎用的な表現ではないと裁判所が決定
Shizens Cosmetic Marketing (M) Sdn Bhd v. LVMH Perfumes and Cosmetics (M) Sdn Bhd 、民事訴訟番号:WA-24IP-21-11/2017(2019年3月19日)において原告は、化粧品、メークアップ用調製品、口紅を含む第3類の商品であるLIP TATTOOの商標登録番号第201301836号の所有者です。原告は、登録条件として「Lip」という言葉を放棄しました。
Shizens Cosmetic Marketing (M) Sdn Bhd v. LVMH Perfumes and Cosmetics (M) Sdn Bhd 、民事訴訟番号:WA-24IP-21-11/2017(2019年3月19日)において原告は、化粧品、メークアップ用調製品、口紅を含む第3類の商品であるLIP TATTOOの商標登録番号第201301836号の所有者です。原告は、登録条件として「Lip」という言葉を放棄しました。
Read More
Re Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP [2020] ATMO 20
The word “TAPESTRY” has been held to not be, to any extent, inherently adapted to distinguish “arranging and conducting of live exhibitions, functions, conferences, conventions, seminars and meetings in the fields of...
The word “TAPESTRY” has been held to not be, to any extent, inherently adapted to distinguish “arranging and conducting of live...
Read More