判例研究:Davies V Lazer Safe Pty Ltd [2019] FCAFC 65
この判例では、平易な英語の意味を用いてクレームを解釈すること、およびクレームの言語に「光沢」を加えないことの重要性が強調されました。
この判例では、平易な英語の意味を用いてクレームを解釈すること、およびクレームの言語に「光沢」を加えないことの重要性が強調されました。
Read More
Case Note: Davies V Lazer Safe Pty Ltd [2019] FCAFC 65
This case highlights the importance of construing claims using plain English meaning and not adding a “gloss” to the language of a claim. Background The primary judge held in Davies V...
This case highlights the importance of construing claims using plain English meaning and not adding a “gloss” to the...
Read More
Singapore Rejects Doctrine of Equivalents
In a recent case before the Court of Appeal of Singapore, the doctrine of equivalents used in other jurisdictions has been found not to apply in Singapore.
In a recent case before the Court of Appeal of Singapore, the doctrine of equivalents used in other jurisdictions...
Read More
Daimler AG [2017] ATMO 116 (17 October 2017)
This matter concerned an application by Daimler to register its AIRPANEL trade mark in Australia. The application was initially objected to by the Australian Trade Marks Office on the...
This matter concerned an application by Daimler to register its AIRPANEL trade mark in Australia. The application was initially...
Read More
Singapore Update: IPOS Revokes Patent Obtained by Misrepresentation
A recent judgement by the Hearing and Mediation Group of the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore has highlighted the need for inventors to draw a line between inventions developed...
A recent judgement by the Hearing and Mediation Group of the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore has highlighted the...
Read More
MAXTRAX: An IP Success Story
MAXTRAX in action www.maxtrax.com.au How a great idea takes shape Many four-wheel driving enthusiasts will agree that MAXTRAX is one of the greatest Australian inventions of all time. This distinctive orange vehicle...
MAXTRAX in action www.maxtrax.com.au How a great idea takes shape Many four-wheel driving enthusiasts will agree that MAXTRAX is one of...
Read More
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v Dunlop Aircraft Tyres [2015] ATMO 14
Goodyear opposed the registration two trade mark applications filed by Dunlop for the trade marks DUNLOP and the D Device. The applications were initially blocked by prior registrations for the...
Goodyear opposed the registration two trade mark applications filed by Dunlop for the trade marks DUNLOP and the D...
Read More
Doric Management Pty Ltd v Loukat Holdings Pty Ltd [2014] ATMO 99
Doric Management opposed the registration of the trade mark filed by Loukat Holdings covering stone bench tops and counters in Class 19, the installation of such items in Class...
Doric Management opposed the registration of the trade mark filed by Loukat Holdings covering stone bench tops and counters...
Read More
Nice One Sydney’s Pty Ltd v Fantastic Holdings Ltd [2014] ATMO 53
Trade Mark application for THE PACKAGE DEAL KINGS covering furniture and retailing was filed by Fantastic Holdings and opposed by Nice One Sydney’s pressing sections 58 and 60. In its...
Trade Mark application for THE PACKAGE DEAL KINGS covering furniture and retailing was filed by Fantastic Holdings and opposed...
Read More